take in
3 meanings
understand and remember new information
What does "take in" mean in this sense?
Examples
- There was so much information that it was hard to take it all in.
- She read the letter twice, but she still couldn't take in what it said.
- He sat quietly for a moment, taking in the news.
How to use it
The most natural word order, especially with pronouns, which must go between the verb and the particle.
The teacher explained so much so quickly that I couldn't take it all in.
Used when the object is a longer noun phrase rather than a pronoun.
It took me a while to take in all the details of the new contract.
Used to describe information that is mentally challenging or overwhelming to process.
The news was so unexpected that it was difficult to take in.
A very fixed and common phrase used when the amount of information feels overwhelming.
They gave us ten pages of notes in one hour — it was too much to take in.
Used when the object is a whole idea or statement, often expressed as a clause.
She listened carefully but struggled to take in what the doctor was telling her.
Common Collocations
Common Mistakes
When the object is a pronoun, it must go between "take" and "in", never after "in". Putting the pronoun at the end is ungrammatical.
"Take in" can also mean to deceive someone, but that sense almost always appears in the passive ("I was taken in by his story"). If you are talking about absorbing information, use the active form with an informational object.
Unlike many phrasal verbs, "take in" is not naturally used in the passive when it means absorbing information. The person doing the understanding should always be the subject.
Usage
This phrasal verb is neutral and suits both spoken and written English. It often suggests that something is hard to process mentally, so it frequently appears in negative or difficult contexts: 'It was a lot to take in' or 'I couldn't take it all in'.
let someone stay in your home
Sense 2: What does "take sb in" mean?
Examples
- After the earthquake, a local family took in three children who had lost their parents.
- She had nowhere to go, so her neighbour took her in for the winter.
- Dozens of volunteers have taken in stray dogs rescued from the floods.
How to use it
The most common pattern, where the object is a person or animal in need of shelter.
The couple decided to take in a young refugee who had arrived alone in the city.
When the object is a pronoun, it must go between 'take' and 'in' — placing it after 'in' sounds unnatural.
He had nowhere to sleep, so his aunt took him in without hesitation.
Short noun phrases can also be placed between 'take' and 'in' for a natural, slightly more emphatic feel.
The charity took the whole family in and provided them with food and clothing.
The passive is very natural, especially when focusing on the experience of the person who receives shelter.
After losing her home, she was taken in by a local family for several months.
This pattern highlights the typical objects — categories of vulnerable people or animals rather than named individuals.
Several households in the village agreed to take in refugees who had just crossed the border.
Common Collocations
Common Mistakes
When the object is a pronoun, it must go between 'take' and 'in'. Placing a pronoun after 'in' sounds ungrammatical in English.
'Put up' suggests casual, short-term hosting ('Can you put me up for the night?'), while 'take in' implies a more sustained, compassionate act of sheltering someone who is genuinely in need. They are not always interchangeable.
'Take in' has several meanings in English. When the object is a living person or animal in need, it means to shelter them. If the object is abstract (information, a view) or an event (a show), the meaning is completely different. Make sure the context makes the shelter meaning clear.
Usage
This phrasal verb is neutral in register and works in both spoken and written contexts. It implies genuine compassion or charity — it's stronger than simply 'hosting' someone, suggesting the person or animal was in real need.
trick or fool someone into believing something untrue
Sense 3: What does "take sb in" mean?
Examples
- Don't be taken in by his charming manner — he's not as generous as he seems.
- I can't believe she took us all in with that ridiculous story.
- He's a very convincing liar; even the police were taken in by him.
How to use it
The passive is the most natural and frequent form, especially when describing the victim's experience. 'By' introduces the source of deception.
A lot of customers were taken in by the fake reviews on the website.
With pronoun objects, the pronoun must go between 'take' and 'in' — this separation is obligatory.
His story sounded so convincing that it took me completely in.
With short noun phrases, separation is natural and common.
The charming salesperson took most of the customers in with her confident pitch.
This near-fixed warning pattern is extremely common in advice and cautionary contexts.
Don't be taken in by low prices — always check the quality before you buy.
Adverbs like these are very common with this phrasal verb and strengthen the sense of being thoroughly deceived.
She was completely taken in by his false promises of a quick profit.
Common Collocations
Common Mistakes
When the object is a pronoun, it must go between 'take' and 'in'. Placing the pronoun after 'in' sounds unnatural and is considered incorrect.
When 'take in' means deceive, the object is always a person. If the object is information, a scene, or content, it signals a different sense. Compare: 'The scammer took her in' (deceived her) versus 'She took in everything he said' (absorbed/understood it).
'Take in' with this meaning rarely works in the present continuous. It describes the result of being deceived, not an ongoing action, so the simple past or passive is almost always more natural.
Usage
This phrasal verb is neutral and works in both speaking and writing. The passive form 'be taken in by' is the most common pattern and is especially frequent in warnings and advice ('don't be taken in by...').
Frequently Asked Questions
Does 'take in' always suggest something is difficult to understand?
Not always, but very often. "Take in" frequently implies that information requires mental effort to process — it's especially common in situations involving complex, surprising, or overwhelming content. If something was easy to understand, you would more likely just say "understood" or "got it".
Can I use 'take in' without an object?
Not really on its own, but you can use a pronoun when the object is already clear from context. For example, if someone has just heard surprising news, you might say "He just sat there, unable to take it in" — the "it" refers back to the news already mentioned.
Can I say 'take in the view' with this same meaning?
No — "take in the view" belongs to a different sense of the phrasal verb, where it means to observe or look at something visually. The sense covered here is specifically about mentally processing information, so the object should be something informational, like news, details, or an explanation.
Is 'take in' more natural than 'absorb' in conversation?
Yes, in spoken English "take in" is generally the more natural choice. "Absorb" has the same meaning but sounds slightly more formal or written. If you're having a conversation, "take it in" will sound more natural to most native speakers.
Can I say 'I will be taking in the information' in future continuous?
This sounds unnatural and is best avoided. "Take in" in this sense works best in the past simple, present simple, or with modal verbs like "can't" or "couldn't". For example, "I couldn't take it all in" or "it's hard to take in" are much more natural.
Does 'take in' always suggest the person is in serious need, or can it be used for anyone staying with you?
'Take in' carries a strong connotation of compassion and genuine need — it implies the person or animal had few other options. For ordinary hosting (a friend staying the weekend, for example), it would sound slightly odd. In those casual situations, 'have someone to stay' or 'put someone up' fits better.
Can 'take in' be used for animals as well as people?
Yes, it's very commonly used for animals, especially stray or rescued ones. Phrases like 'take in a stray cat' or 'take in a rescue dog' are completely natural and follow exactly the same grammar as with people.
Does 'take in' have other meanings I should know about?
Yes — 'take in' can also mean to deceive someone, to absorb or understand information, or to attend a show or visit sights. The shelter meaning is usually clear from context because the object is always a living person or animal in a difficult situation, rather than an abstract concept or an event.
Is it natural to use 'take in' in the passive?
Very natural — in fact, passive constructions are especially common with this sense because the focus is often on the experience of the person being helped. 'She was taken in by a local family' or 'the children were taken in by volunteers' are both perfectly normal sentences.
Can organisations or charities be the subject, or is it only individuals?
Both work well. You can say a family, a neighbour, a charity, a church, or even a government scheme 'takes in' people in need. The key is that someone is actively offering shelter out of generosity or duty, regardless of whether the subject is a person or an institution.
Does 'taken in' suggest the victim did something wrong?
Slightly, yes. 'Taken in' often carries a mild implication that the victim was too trusting or naive — not just unlucky. It's not a harsh judgement, but it does suggest the person perhaps should have been more careful. This is why warnings like 'don't be taken in by...' are so common.
Can 'take in' meaning deceive be used in the present tense?
Yes, but it works best in the simple present for general statements, such as 'This kind of scam takes in thousands of people every year.' The present continuous ('he is taking me in') sounds unnatural for this sense and is best avoided. The simple past and passive forms are the most common.
Does 'take in' always mean the same thing?
No — 'take in' has several completely different meanings in English, such as absorbing information, providing shelter for someone, or making a piece of clothing smaller. The 'deceive' sense is easy to identify because the object is always a person being tricked, and the passive 'be taken in by' is a strong signal of this particular meaning.
Is 'take in' more British or more international?
It is slightly more common in British English, but it is widely understood and used across all varieties of English. You will hear and read it in American, Australian, and international contexts without any confusion.
What kinds of things can someone be 'taken in by'?
The 'by' phrase typically introduces the source of the deception — this could be a person, such as a con artist, or something more abstract, such as charm, appearances, false promises, flattery, a scam, or misleading advertising. Essentially, anything convincing enough to trick someone can follow 'taken in by'.
Ready to practise?
Practise 1,000+ English phrasal verbs with interactive gap-fill exercises.
Start Practising →